<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lat/Am Daily &#187; macro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.latamdaily.com/tag/macro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.latamdaily.com</link>
	<description>Interesting bits and pieces from all over Latin America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:07:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Untethering</title>
		<link>http://www.latamdaily.com/2010/04/21/untethering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.latamdaily.com/2010/04/21/untethering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 02:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Krupa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colombia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Costa Rica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Salvador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.latamdaily.com/?p=821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone seems to agree that the economies of Latin America are experiencing a nice little recovery. The IMF, for example, just raised its forecasts for the region and is now projecting 4.1% GDP growth for the region, with 4.2% growth for Mexico and 5.5% for Brazil. Oh boy, numbers. But here&#8217;s something interesting. In an [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.latamdaily.com/2010/03/26/717/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: '></a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.latamdaily.com/2010/02/24/311/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: '></a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.latamdaily.com/2010/03/28/732/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: '></a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-822" title="PortoManausContainer2" src="http://www.latamdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/PortoManausContainer2.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="154" />Everyone seems to agree that the economies of Latin America are experiencing a nice little recovery. The IMF, for example, <a href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2010/01/">just raised</a> its forecasts for the region and is now projecting 4.1% GDP growth for the region, with 4.2% growth for Mexico and 5.5% for Brazil. Oh boy, numbers.</p>
<p>But here&#8217;s something interesting.</p>
<p>In an <a href="http://www.fitchratings.com/dtp/pdf2-10/509805.pdf">analysis of the region&#8217;s sovereign debt prospects (PDF)</a>, Fitch Ratings divides the region&#8217;s economies into three &#8220;camps.&#8221; One camp includes countries like Venezuela, Argentina, and Ecuador, whose recovery will be slower than that of the rest of the world for reasons that should surprise no one (high inflation, weak institutions, poor fiscal discipline, if you must know).</p>
<p>In a second camp are countries like Chile, Peru, and Brazil, whose good fiscal discipline, low political risk, and safe investment environments mean their economies will be growing like weeds this year and next.</p>
<p>Then we have the middle camp, which is basically countries that cast their development lot with the United States: Mexico, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador. And here&#8217;s the interesting part. Fitch projects this group will see only a moderately-paced recovery <em>specifically because</em> they&#8217;re tied to the US.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Fitch says the Chile/Peru/Brazil group is doing particularly well partly because it does more business with China.</p>
<p>So I ask you: At what other point in recent history has easy access and close ties to the US economy been seen as a <em>disadvantage</em>?</p>
<p><em>(Original <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PortoManausContainer.jpg">image</a> courtesy H. Langos via Wikimedia Commons.)</em></p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.latamdaily.com/2010/03/26/717/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: '></a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.latamdaily.com/2010/02/24/311/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: '></a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.latamdaily.com/2010/03/28/732/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: '></a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.latamdaily.com/2010/04/21/untethering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

